1. |
When
you cite more than one factor in explaining the change in a financial
statement line item the amounts of the individual factors cited, including
offsetting factors, should be separately quantified. For example, revise
future filings to quantify the key drivers of higher SG&A expenses in
fiscal 2004 such as increase currency translation effects and higher sales
commissions paid. In addition, each significant factor that contributed to
the significant variances in net sales and expenses should also be
quantified and discussed. Please apply throughout MD&A to the extent
practicable in future filings. |
2. |
We
note that you discontinued the production of sale of underperforming
products, In future filings, please disclose the products discontinued and
make quantified disclosures about anticipated and actual cost savings
derived from your restructuring efforts during the periods
presented. |
3. |
The
audit report included in the Form 10-K filed in EDGAR is not signed. In
future filings ensure that the audit report includes the conformed
signature of your independent auditor. Refer to Regulation S-X, Article
2. |
4. |
It
appears that your service fee revenues were over 10 percent of total
revenues for the periods presented. In future filings revise your income
statement to separately disclose revenues from the sale of products,
services, and other products if revenues from any individual referenced
components are more than 10 percent of the total revenue for the year.
Related costs and expenses should also be disclosed separately. Refer to
Regulation S-X, Article 5-03 (b)(1) and (2). |
5. |
We
note that “variable options expense” is included as a non-operating
expense in your consolidated statement of operations. In future filings,
please revise to include as part of operating expense or tell us why the
current presentation is appropriate. |
6. |
We
note that you entered into forward currency exchange contracts to hedge
inter-company liabilities and commitments denominated in foreign
currencies. We also note that you are accounting for them as cash flow
hedges. Please explain how you met the criteria in paragraph 40 of SFAS
133, including subparagraphs A, B, and C as
applicable. |
(a) |
We
have a formal hedging policy that outlines our risk management objectives
and strategy. We also document the risk management objective for each
hedge contract at the time we enter into a hedge contract. We hedge
intercompany shipments based on forecast transactions with our
subsidiaries. The hedge contracts are placed for the month the shipments
are forecast to occur and are assigned to the first shipments of the
month. We test the effectiveness of all hedge contracts at each quarter
end. |
(b) |
See
(a) above |
(c) |
We
do not enter into written options |
(d) |
We
do not enter into hedging instruments used to modify the interest receipts
or payments associated with a financial asset of
liability. |
(a) |
The
transactions hedged are identified as a group of individual transactions
and represent intercompany machine shipments. The group of transaction
share the same risk exposure. |
(b) |
The
transactions forecast are probable. |
(c) |
The
transactions are not with an external party. However, this criteria is not
required and hedge accounting can be used. |
(d) |
We
do not hedge a forecasted transaction for the acquisition of an asset or
incurrence of a liability to be subsequently remeasured.
|
(e) |
We
do not hedge the variable cash flows of forecasted transactions related to
a debt security that is classified as
held-to-maturity. |
(f) |
We
do not hedge forecasted transactions related to a business
combination. |
(g) |
We
do not hedge transactions for the forecasted sale and purchase of a
non-financial asset. |
(h) |
We
do not hedge the forecasted purchase or sale of a financial asset or
liability or the variable cash inflow and outflow of an existing financial
asset or liability. |
7. |
Describe
the significant terms of your agreements with distributors, including
payment, return, exchange, and other significant matters. Supplementally
explain and support when you believe it is appropriate to recognize
revenue of products sent to distributors. Revise future filings as
necessary. Refer to SAB 104 and to SFAS 48 in your
response. |
· |
Persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists.
Distributor orders are prepared by the distributor and acknowledged by
Hurco. |
· |
Delivery
has occurred or services have been rendered. We
recognize revenue at the time of shipment because ownership and risk of
loss |
· |
passes
to the distributor at that time. We consider the machine installation
process to be inconsequential and perfunctory. |
· |
The
seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. The
price is included on the order acknowledgement. |
· |
Collectibility
is reasonably assured. We
perform credit checks on all distributors prior to
shipment. |
8. |
We
note that title is retained for products sent to certain foreign locations
under a “retention of title clause.” Tell us more about this. For example,
who has the risk of loss in the event of theft or physical destruction or
damage to the product? Who carries insurance on the property after the
products are shipped? Tell us in greater detail why you believe your
current accounting complies with GAAP. |
9. |
Supplementally
describe the existing inventive programs currently in place. Are these
shown as a reduction of revenue? When are they recorded and how are they
measured? Tell us how volume discounts and sales incentives are estimated
at the time of shipment. Refer to EITF 01-9 in your
response |
10. |
If
shipping and handling fees and/or costs are material, please quantify
these revenues and costs and explain in future filings how they are
classified in the income statement. Refer to EITF 00-10 in your
response. |
11. |
Supplementally
and in detail, explain the nature of your product or products. Do you sell
hardware and software separately or together? If together, how do you
allocate revenue to these elements? Are customers provided with a right to
receive additional software products free or at a reduced price? Does your
fee also cover PCS or other service elements? How is revenue allocated and
recognized for PCS and other service arrangements? Explain how you comply
with SOP 97-2. Note that reference to accounting literature is not
sufficient disclosure. |
12. |
In
future filings please relocate the disclosures required by SFAS 148 to
include in the summary of significant accounting policies in your
financial statements. |
13. |
We
note that you have presented summarized financial information for two
affiliates accounted for using the equity method. We assume that the
affiliates do not meet the significance criteria set forth under Rule
3-09. Please confirm and provide your calculation. You need only provide
your detailed computations for the income test (condition 3) as outlined
in Rule 1-02(w). |
14. |
Disclosure
of long-lived assets by geographic area under SFAS 131 should present
tangible assets only and should not include intangibles or investments. Se
question 22 in the FASB Staff Implementation Guide to Statement 131.
Revise future filings as necessary. |
15. |
If
revenues derived from any particular foreign country are material, revise
future filings to disclose the name of the country and the amount of
revenue from the country. Refer to paragraph 38(a) SFAS
131. |
· |
Hurco
Companies, Inc. is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in the filings; |
· |
Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the
filings reviewed buy the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking
any action with respect to the filing; and |
· |
Hurco
Companies, Inc. may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States. |
Exhibit
A |
|||||||
Hurco
Companies, Inc. |
|||||||
Significant
Subsidiary Test - Rule 1-02(w) |
|||||||
October
31, 2004 |
|||||||
Subsidiary
Name |
HAL |
Quasar |
|||||
Fiscal
2004 income - as defined by Rule 1-02(w) |
$ |
790,000 |
$ |
1,419,000 |
|||
Ownership
Percentage |
35 |
% |
23 |
% | |||
Hurco
Percentage of Income |
276,500
|
326,370
|
|||||
Consolidated
2004 income - as defined by Rule 1-02(w) |
$ |
7,568,000 |
$ |
7,568,000 |
|||
Percent
of income to consolidated income. |
3.7 |
% |
4.3 |
% | |||
Conclusion:
The percent of income included in Hurco's consolidated
results | |||||||
is
below 20%. Therefore, the Hurco subsidiaries are not significant
| |||||||
subsidiaries
in accordance with Rule 1-02(w). |